Written by Kidge.
So this could be a book. As an English teacher, I feel myself noticing certain patterns and character archetypes which turn up in many of the dramas that I have watched. Admittedly, this pertains perhaps most to rom-coms as it is the genre I watch most commonly. Here are a few examples that I love/love to laugh at because they are so overused they have become clichés.
So this could be a book. As an English teacher, I feel myself noticing certain patterns and character archetypes which turn up in many of the dramas that I have watched. Admittedly, this pertains perhaps most to rom-coms as it is the genre I watch most commonly. Here are a few examples that I love/love to laugh at because they are so overused they have become clichés.
Number 1: the Candy. I don’t know who came up with this
name, but it describes the girl who is from a poor background, who is plucky,
works fifteen jobs and likes to tell the hero where to get off. This is because
the Candy, in my experience, is almost exclusively loved by handsome boys with
an excess of wealth and a dearth of politeness/common human decency. But
through her plucky downtrodden ways and willingness to tell said hero that he
is in fact a selfish human being, she manages to capture his heart, overcome an
evil mother/a world that says they shouldn’t be together, and basically live
happily ever after. If you think this sounds like a better version of
Cinderella, you would be right. It doesn’t matter how many times I see this
character, I still end up wanting her to triumph over the odds, and hope that
one day, my life might be the same.
Number 2: the Chaebol/AKA the wealthy jerkface. This is
really not a harsh descriptor. Chaebol’s are sons of extremely wealthy
businessmen who own corporations which they will one day inherit. These boys
are almost universally tall, handsome and completely self-obsessed. Their money
has brought them a world of privilege, so when they encounter a poor Candy,
they are simultaneously horrified and bizarrely attracted to an individual who
actually has to work for their salary. The arc of the Chaebol is completely
predictable. They begin as awful human beings who only care about those who are
in a similar social class to themselves. They then proceed to fall in love with
a Candy, stalk said Candy until they give in to the pestering infant, and then
magically change into a nicer, more well-rounded individual who might benefit
the world he lives in. Harsh? Maybe. Do I end up loving them anyway? You betcha
baby. Long live the Chaebol.
Number 3: the Evil Parents. This one is a little vaguer,
in that there is more variation. However, the following points are
exceptionally common. For one reason or another, there is only one parent
around, which has left said parent slightly bitter and twisted, or
exceptionally protective of their child. This results in the parent feeling
like the love interest in the story is not good enough for their child. Sigh.
How deluded. Evil Parents are often also linked to Chaebol families. The
parents of Chaebol children cannot stand Candy’s because they are of such a
dissimilar social circumstance, and therefore will not assist in building a
respectful family tree. Come to think of it, Evil Parents are normally a result
of wealth and an over inflated need to control the lives of their children. I’m
sure some of you can relate.
Number 4: the Second Lead Male/AKA the guy who
should get the girl, but somehow doesn’t. This poor individual has a special
place in my heart. He is almost always an intelligent, emotionally available,
attractive male, who somehow gets sidelined into the friend zone within the first
couple of episodes of a drama. To add to the list of traits that scream DATE
ME, the SLM is also invariably self-sacrificing, humble and generally a great
friend to the love interest and his best buddy who ends up getting the girl.
Talk about raw end of the stick. Girls, be nice to the SLM, they will be around
when the hero packs his bags and bails for Macau.
0 comments:
Post a Comment